I believe the Mopar PCM gets rid of that. Just curious, why not go with the
Mopar PCM for the 4.7L instead of the Jet-II?
- Bernd
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Arnoldo Silva
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 11:15 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re: RE: RE: JET STAGE 2 CHIP
another thing bernd how do i get rid of the 100 mile an hour limiter i hate
that thing seems like the dak has a lot more punch left when that thing
comes on.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 10:40 PM
Subject: DML: RE: RE: JET STAGE 2 CHIP
>
> On the 3.9's, they work very well. On the 5.2's, it's mixed feelings. On
> the 5.9's...don't bother...get a mopar PCM instead.
>
> Someone did post (a while ago) that they installed one on their 4.7L and
> loved it.
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of William H. Hiatt III
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 10:36 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: RE: JET STAGE 2 CHIP
>
>
> Arnoldo,
> The JET chip has been known to hurt performance in many applications
(I'm
> not sure about the 4.7l, but I know in the 5.9, it blows. Just so you
know,
> Dodge doesn't make a 4.9l (Currently, atleast). It's a 4.7l :)
>
> William
>
> P.S. Typing in all caps is in an Email isn't considered proper
'netettique'.
> (Some people percieve it as yelling)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Arnoldo Silva
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 8:21 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: JET STAGE 2 CHIP
>
>
> I NEED TO KNOW WHY EVERYBODY DOES NOT LIKE THE JET CHIP FOR THE 4.9
DOES
> ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING GOOD TO SAY ABOUT IT. IT LOOKS COOL WHAT ELSE IS
THEIR
> BESIDES THE MOPAR COMPUTER. PLEASE RESPOND ANYBODY.
>
> THANKS ARNOLD
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:24 EDT