Re: RE: 4.7 or 5.9?

From: Jim Miller (jim76712@swbell.net)
Date: Sun Feb 25 2001 - 21:58:25 EST

Next message: Robert R.II: "mobil 1 ?'s"
Previous message: dwmagnum: "Re: 4.7 or 5.9?"
In reply to: Ronald Wong: "RE: 4.7 or 5.9?"
Next in thread: Andy Levy: "DML Weirdness WAS Re: RE: 4.7 or 5.9?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Jim Miller wrote:
Mine Too. 28k miles, no mechanical problems I have a friend with a 85 Ram
with 330k on his 360. Not even a valve job.
99 RT

Ronald Wong wrote:

> However, the 4.7 and 45RFE have their own little problems. My 5.9 has been
> flawless so far.
>

Next message: Robert R.II: "mobil 1 ?'s"
Previous message: dwmagnum: "Re: 4.7 or 5.9?"
In reply to: Ronald Wong: "RE: 4.7 or 5.9?"
Next in thread: Andy Levy: "DML Weirdness WAS Re: RE: 4.7 or 5.9?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:30 EDT