RE: Re: 142 mph in 9.91 seconds without going over 3k RPMs

From: Stlaurent Mr Steven (STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil)
Date: Fri Mar 02 2001 - 17:39:40 EST


Try a highly modified engine that was done correctly...

--------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
(Work) 760-725-2506 (DSN: 365)
(Work) mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
(Home) mailto:saint1958@home.com
"In fact, my work has already proven
itself to be correct. People such
as you just haven't gotten it yet.
(unknown author)

-----Original Message-----
From: TJ Goettner [mailto:TNJG999@email.msn.com]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 3:04 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Re: 142 mph in 9.91 seconds without going over 3k RPMs

What all is done to your truck anyway, gotta web site?
Sorry, I dont keep up on all of the names around here.

TJ
----- Original Message -----
From: <ABeerCan@aol.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Re: 142 mph in 9.91 seconds without going over 3k RPMs

> In a message dated 3/1/01 10:09:25 PM Central Standard Time,
> editzero@yahoo.com writes:
>
> << 9.91@142mph or kph and keeping it under 2600 either
> way by bull$hit detector just went off so loud it left
> me deaf in my left ear >>
>
> In a message dated 3/1/01 10:23:49 PM Central Standard Time,
> TNJG999@email.msn.com writes:
>
> << Umm, like thats fast and stuff.....
> This guys on the DML?
>
>
> TJ >>
>
> That was an explanation of a mistake made. I ran the 9.91@142mph this
past
> Sunday in the 1/4 mile. Yes I am on the DML. And I didn't run it under
> 2600, actually, switch the first two and you have my rev limiter. I
bumped
> 6100 at every gear change.
>
> Will
>
> "You better hope there is intelligent life out there somewhere,
> Cause I think we got cheated down here on Earth!"



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:54 EDT