Re: My flow #s are in:McKenzie stage 3 vs Hughes stage 1

From: Scott Quaranta (mquarantaca@earthlink.net)
Date: Sun Mar 04 2001 - 02:43:35 EST

Next message: Ronald Wong: "RE: RE: RE: Blew up the Blower tonight"
Previous message: Arnoldo Silva: "Re: RE: rear end gears and posi unit"
In reply to: TommFern@aol.com: "My flow #s are in:McKenzie stage 3 vs Hughes stage 1"
Next in thread: TommFern@aol.com: "Re: My flow #s are in:McKenzie stage 3 vs Hughes stage 1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 3/3/01 6:33 PM, TommFern@aol.com at TommFern@aol.com wrote:

> lift intake exhaust
> Hughes/McKenzie: 200 126/144 115/131
> 250 159/181 ----/166
> 300 187/210 1756/188
> 350 207/235 174/204
> 400 219/257 179/212
> 450 232/279 183/214
> 500 239/281 186/215
>
> Mckenzie heads: Fully ported,2.02/1.625 stainless valves
> Hughes heads: mild porting,stock valves
> Tom
>
those are great numbers, how much...?...$

Scott Q

Next message: Ronald Wong: "RE: RE: RE: Blew up the Blower tonight"
Previous message: Arnoldo Silva: "Re: RE: rear end gears and posi unit"
In reply to: TommFern@aol.com: "My flow #s are in:McKenzie stage 3 vs Hughes stage 1"
Next in thread: TommFern@aol.com: "Re: My flow #s are in:McKenzie stage 3 vs Hughes stage 1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:56 EDT