i have a 2k cc 4x4 3.55posi 4.7 auto, 35k miles, 31x10.5x15 bfg ko's
no ac/no power windows anything. ok let me give you my .02$
1)i never wanted a 4x2 living in northern michigan we get a lot of snow
this winter i have driven in snow 1/2 way up the grill with no
problem. in mud that was 8" deep and didn't get stuck. i have
used the the recmened service, but do change eng. oil& fliter
at 5k.Mobil 1.
2) never had any teuble with the auto, but some on the list have.like
going into drive whin wanting rev./hard shifting/rpm's up&down
3)you do not want part time 4x4 used on dry/wet payment.it weres out
your
u joints and tranfer case but the good news is you can get
full time 4x4.
good luck with your new dak which everone you get.
Davidson, Kevin wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I've been considering getting a new dak (currently have a 97 V6), and I might
> have to do it sooner than originally planned due to reasons beyond my control.
>
> Anyways... I test drove a 5.9L 4x4 QC this evening, and while I wipe the drool
> off my face, I want to toss a couple questions out there and see what you all
> have to say. I apologize if I am rehashing things that have already been
> overdiscussed in here, but I haven't had the time to stay current with every
> post...
>
> (1) For you 4x4 owners out there - do any of you wish you had opted for the 4x2
> instead? If so - why? I am concerned about a couple things - namely, the
> added effort for maintenance such as fluid changes, clutch replacement, oil
> pan gasket, CV boots & joints (I assume the 4x4 dak has these?), stuff like that.
> How much extra maintenance work is necessary with 4x4? And does this affect the
> procedure for replacing front brake discs?
>
> My other concern is whether or not I can even justify having 4 wheel drive. Any
> time it rains out, all I do is sit and spin in my current dak (2 wheel), and
> for the entire winter I haul around close to 500lbs of sand. This becomes a very
> tedious thing to deal with. I won't be doing any hardcore offroading, but I will
> be driving in people's wet soggy backyards (got stuck once...) occasionally and
> also towing a 14' boat. I know that whenever I have to do something extra (like
> dealing with sandbags all winter... or getting stuck in a FLAT yard!!!) because I
> have 2 wheel drive, I end up cussing myself for not getting 4x4 when I bought my 97.
> Any input?
>
> (2) Is the 5sp that comes with the 4.7 a decent unit? The tranny in my V6 shifts
> beautifully; the shifter and gate feels good and solid. However, I test drove
> a Ram with the manual tranny (can't remember which engine, it was a V8 though) and
> I was extremely dissappointed with the way the tranny felt. The shifter felt real
> cheap and rough, like I was going to break something just putting it in gear. I
> am just wondering how the dakota's 4.7L manual tranny compares (and if it's a
> different unit or not). Unfortunately, my local dealer doesn't have a 4.7L 5sp on
> his lot, so I couldn't test drive one. Are the 4.7L manual owners satisfied?
>
> (3) If I end up disliking the 4.7L manual tranny, then I'm looking at either a 5.9L
> auto or a 4.7L auto. Which is recommended? (based primarily on transmissions...)
> I've heard a variety of stories about chrysler automatic transmissions, ranging
> anywhere from good and trouble-free, to horrible and beyond.
>
> Thanks in advance for any input you can provide, and I apologize for the long post.
> (...and for potentially rehashing any recent discussions!)
>
> -kevin d
> 97 cc V6 5sp
> homebrew k&n, 3923's, superconductor 8.5mm, 180tstat
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:06 EDT