Re: flowmaster part num. needed

From: Arnoldo Silva (silva@rio.bravo.net)
Date: Wed Mar 14 2001 - 00:31:11 EST


bernd, ive got some dynomax racemagnums very simaliar to the ultraflow
maybe even the same muff. there the oval type do you think it would be to
loud? bought them from a buddy he said they were racemagnums. but after
looking at pic of ultraflow prob. the same muff.
thanks
arnold
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
To: <dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET>
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 10:07 PM
Subject: RE: DML: flowmaster part num. needed

>
> They're all about the same...with the exception of the Dynomax Ultra-Flow
> mufflers (1000+CFM).
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of xjruss@excite.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 9:30 PM
> To: dakota-truck-digest@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: flowmaster part num. needed
>
>
> Which one is the worst flowing muffler, Gibson or Flowmaster?
>
> Russ
> '99 CC SLT+ V8 4x4 auto
> Gibson Stainless Headers and Exhaust
> Rancho RS9000s, Amsoil Air Filter,
> Magnecore 8mm wires, Amsoil throughout
>
>
> >>>>Are you sure you want the worst flowing performance muffler of all?
Not
> my opinion just the flow chart specs. Anyway I don't think anybody has a
> front of the tire pipe for the late model daks because the frame is in the
> way and going under it would be a clearance problem. There is none
> available for my 99 R/T RC either.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Send a cool gift with your E-Card
> http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
>
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:08 EDT