RE: RE: Re: dynomax racemagnums on 4.7

From: jdurling@mindspring.com
Date: Wed Mar 14 2001 - 11:30:39 EST


----Original Message-----
>From: Tom Slick North <prodog@swbell.net>
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: DML: RE: Re: dynomax racemagnums on 4.7
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Date: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 8:50 AM
>
>Plus water doesn't flow the same way as exhaust gas.... particularly in
>pulses of resonating air and in regards to compression and expansion...water
>is very unforgiving in those to respects....it's like comparing apples to
>oranges....
>
>Later,
>Tom "Slick"
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
>[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of Mark Kuzia
>Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 3:40 AM
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: DML: Re: dynomax racemagnums on 4.7
>
>
>IMHO, I have always believed that the flow tests tend to be a little off
>with the Flowmasters because the tests are done with water and the odd
>baffle design would skew the results. I imagine that air should flow better
>in these mufflers. Many people use these mufflers, probably more than any
>other brand, they can't be that bad. I also belive that you should go with
>the muffler you like the sound of instead of flow rate, as there may only be
>a 2-3 horsepower difference anyway.
>
>Mark Kuzia
>flyboy01@mediaone.net
>http://people.mw.mediaone.net/flyboy01/home.html
>1995 Dakota 13.79 @ 102.45 mph
>360ci, 5-spd, 4.11 LS(8 3/4 coming soon), Cowl-induction
>(A new E-body 8 3/4 [3.90 SG] has been built by Reider Racing)
>http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/FqNiqqo2UjQOY/
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Arnoldo Silva" <silva@rio.bravo.net>
>To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 11:19 PM
>Subject: DML: dynomax racemagnums on 4.7
>
>
>> i was asking about putting a flowmaster on my truck and someone on here
>> said that they were the worst flowing muff. i have a dynomax racemagnum
>in
>> my garage would this be better? straight through design wouldnt this
>> muffler be to loud?
>> thanks
>> arnold
>>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:10 EDT