Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Jet Chip vs Mopar Computer - which to use??

From: TJ Goettner (TNJG999@email.msn.com)
Date: Wed Mar 21 2001 - 21:57:25 EST


cool, thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ronald Wong" <ron-wong@home.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 3:13 PM
Subject: RE: DML: RE: Re: RE: Re: Jet Chip vs Mopar Computer - which to
use??

> Keith Black?
>
> Ron
> 00 PB SLT QC 4X2 5.9 46RE 3.92 LSD
> For modifications see my DML Profile (URL follows)
> http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/Kw9pV1EkFeOYY
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of TJ Goettner
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 5:49 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: RE: Re: RE: Re: Jet Chip vs Mopar Computer - which to
> use??
>
>
> you said "at that time" are they making lighter pistons now? if so who?
id
> like to know so when I rebuild mine I can put them in, given they make
> oversized too. thats not for a LONG time though....
>
>
> TJ
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Tom" <tigers@bserv.com>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 7:53 AM
> Subject: Re: DML: RE: Re: RE: Re: Jet Chip vs Mopar Computer - which to
> use??
>
>
> > At 08:00 AM 3/21/01 -0800, you wrote:
> > >OK, if the springs and retainers are good, what about the rocker arms
and
> > >especially the weight of the pistons, doesnt that count at 6000 rpms?
> > >TJ
> >
> > Yep. You can also include the lifters and pushrods. When I had the MP
> > Magnum R/T cam installed, I decided to beef up everything at the same
> time.
> > The MP cam kit comes with a set of better than stock lifters (actually,
> > came with
> > 10 of them) and the MP 1.6 aluminum roller rockers came with a set of
> > strengthened
> > pushrods. Generally, aftermarket rockers will have less spec.
production
> > differences
> > among them than stock ones.
> >
> > Lighter weight/stronger pistons are good but I stayed with the stock
ones
> > because, at
> > that time, no one in the aftermarket had them out for the magnums.
Custom
> > made ones were far too expensive.
> >
> > Bob Tom Burlington, Ont., Canada
> > '97 CC Dakota, 5.2L, 4x2, auto., 3.92SG, 4,265 lb (racing weight)
> > Dyno: 231.2 rwhp 340.0 lb-ft rwtorque
> > PB: 14.737 @ 91.75 9.364 @ 72.95
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:20 EDT