RE: 3.7 V-6

• Next message: The Man From Utopia: "RE: RE: Greg's trip to Texas.. Was: What a F**king Blast! and a littlespank on a GT (Long) FormerlyRE: This time tomorrow"
• Previous message: Tom Slick North: "RE: I'm not Impressed! (Drinking & Driving)"
• In reply to: Andy Levy: "Re: 3.7 V-6"
• Next in thread: Alex Harris: "Re: 3.7 V-6"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hehehehehe....from what I heard...that one should be. ;)

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of Andy Levy
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 4:40 PM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: Re: DML: 3.7 V-6

Could it be classified as.....anemic? :)

bernd@texas.net wrote:

> And they've been having "performance" issues with it already (the 3.7L).
>
> - Bernd
>
> > It's derived from the 4.7L V8 and will become the company-standard
"truck" V6
> > for Jeeps (JGC, Liberty and Cherokee, probably Wrangler as well), Rams
and
> > Dakotas over the next couple years.
> >
> > tim.bollin@tps.org wrote:
> >
> > > I recently read in the latest Pop. Mechanics of a 3.7L V6 210 HP being
the
> > > standard engine of the Ram trucks. Anyone have info on this?
> >
> >

• Next message: The Man From Utopia: "RE: RE: Greg's trip to Texas.. Was: What a F**king Blast! and a littlespank on a GT (Long) FormerlyRE: This time tomorrow"
• Previous message: Tom Slick North: "RE: I'm not Impressed! (Drinking & Driving)"
• In reply to: Andy Levy: "Re: 3.7 V-6"
• Next in thread: Alex Harris: "Re: 3.7 V-6"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:56 EDT