In theory, it is possible, sure. However, there is an aerodynamic wall that
everyone will hit. At which point it takes a very, very large amount of power
to break on through to the other side.
Your little 4 cylinder can do better than 100 as well, given the right rear
end. It's just a question of how long it takes to get there.
Miles Harris wrote:
> I had my 2.5L up to 100 mph and it still had a little left on a level
> surface. Dodge spec's list the top speed at 105 mph. I didn't check the
> tach at the time (more interested in traffic at the time). According to the
> rpm spreadsheet I have (downloaded from someone on the list awhile ago) the
> truck was running around 4000 rpm. My guess with weight and wind drag I
> was running closer to 4500 rpm (just a guess). In theory and without any
> speed limiter, the little 4-banger could go about 125 mph at 5200 rpm (peak
> hp and where the rpm limiter shuts down the engine, know this because once
> I ran it to the limit in first gear, stupid I know). Of course I doubt
> there is a straight highway long enough for the four cylinder to reach that
> speed even if wind resistance and weight were not a factor.
>
> The point is if my little 4 cylinder with a 3.92 rear-end can reach 100
> plus, I don't see why the bigger engines couldn't hit 120 plus (without
> speed limiter) with any of the rear axles. At least in theory.
>
> As usual I've rambled enough.
>
> --
> Miles Harris III
> Simi Valley, CA
> 01 Silver Dakota CC Sport, 2.5L, 5speed
> 01 Gold Saturn SC1 (3 door coupe) 1.9L SOC, 4speed auto
> http://www.spikesautos.homestead.com/Dak1.html
> Profile: http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/PfCA4R1zO470w
>
> "Heather Mosley" <hmosley1@austin.rr.com> wrote in article
> <012f01c0be47$2d9ea120$67944442@austin.rr.com>...
> > Ummmmmm, I've hit 100 before. I don't think they have put a speed
> limiter
> > on my truck cause it's a 4-banger :) But I was at a downhill slope on
> my
> > way to Austin one day and of course, no cops around :)
> >
> > Heather
> > Austin, Tx
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:57 EDT