Re: RE: RE: Wattage vs. candlepower? - Long response

From: Jack Hilton (hemi@charter.net)
Date: Wed Apr 11 2001 - 12:01:23 EDT

Next message: Ronald Wong: "RE: RE: RE: Wattage vs. candlepower? - Long response"
Previous message: Mike Crumley: "Re: remove"
In reply to: Ronald Wong: "RE: RE: Wattage vs. candlepower? - Long response"
Next in thread: Ronald Wong: "RE: RE: RE: Wattage vs. candlepower? - Long response"
Reply: Ronald Wong: "RE: RE: RE: Wattage vs. candlepower? - Long response"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

So you're saying size matters, Ronald ? The bigger the better ?

hehe
;)

Ronald Wong wrote:

> Long posts like this are excellent. Never a problem.
>
> Ron
> 00 PB SLT QC 4X2 5.9 46RE 3.92 LSD
> For modifications see my DML Profile (URL follows)
> http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/Kw9pV1EkFeOYY

Next message: Ronald Wong: "RE: RE: RE: Wattage vs. candlepower? - Long response"
Previous message: Mike Crumley: "Re: remove"
In reply to: Ronald Wong: "RE: RE: Wattage vs. candlepower? - Long response"
Next in thread: Ronald Wong: "RE: RE: RE: Wattage vs. candlepower? - Long response"
Reply: Ronald Wong: "RE: RE: RE: Wattage vs. candlepower? - Long response"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:00 EDT