Re: Cast your votes: Gibson vs. Flowmaster

From: Dakota Dodge (dakotasdodge@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Apr 26 2001 - 00:06:57 EDT


Dynomax....

oh... that wasnt a choice was it... My Bad!!!

-Dakota
http://www.dakota2.4mg.com

>From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
>To: dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
>Subject: DML: RE: Re: Cast your votes: Gibson vs. Flowmaster
>Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:11:47 -0500
>
>
>So tell me, what does the flow rating done on a regulated bench mean to
>mufflers? (They use turbulent pulses rather than a controlled flow rate,
>like that used on a flow-bench.)
>
>Just my $0.02 worth... ;)
>
>- Bernd
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
>Subject: DML: Re: Cast your votes: Gibson vs. Flowmaster
>
>Gibson for performance (better air flow), Flowmaster for sound. Both have
>more flow than a standard muffler.
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:11 EDT