Re: Re: Cast your votes: Gibson vs. Flowmaster

From: Krawdaddy (black98dak@home.com)
Date: Thu Apr 26 2001 - 05:38:52 EDT


sorry... I really DIDN'T get it for performance, just sound. I was going to
go with no muffler, but that would have been too loud

--------------------------------------------------
Krawdaddy - New Orleans, La.
      www.krawdaddy.net
           ICQ# 2325710
--------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Miller" <jim76712@swbell.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Re: Cast your votes: Gibson vs. Flowmaster

> I am about to replace the muffler and tailpipe on my R/T with a Ultraflo
dual
> outlet muffler like the factory unit only a dual outlet version. I AM
> concerned about power and mileage as most of the DMLers are. I do not
want any
> muffler I cant see through! I don't see how baffles can help but slow
down the
> flow of the exhaust. Blowmasters have baffles and you cant see through
them.
> Tests prove they are one of the poorest flowing performance muffler on the
> market. If you want noise and don't care about power or mileage go with
the
> blowmaster. My vote goes to the Dynomax Ultraflow. I really cant believe
the
> remark below!
> Jim in Waco...99 R/T
>
> > I have a 40 series dual outlet flowmaster welded in behind the cat.
> > I like the sound of flowmaster and wasn't really concerned with a
> > power gain.
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:11 EDT