Re: 3.7 liter engine to replace 3.9 liter in 2002

From: Chris Lang (langerdak@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Apr 26 2001 - 15:45:55 EDT


Just like stock for stock a 5.2 dusts a 4.7 David? Yeah its awful my 4.7 is
faster, has better mileage,weighs less, and doesn't ping like my old 5.2.
The only thing that sucks about the new engines is that the mods are limited
but they are getting better. Stock for stock I highly doubt a 3.9 is going
to dust a 3.7 I doubt it will beat it at all, especally when you compare the
#'s between the two engines.

>From: "David D." <dodgedakotaquadcab@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: Re: DML: 3.7 liter engine to replace 3.9 liter in 2002
>Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:24:00 -0500
>
>I SECOND THAT..I hope the new 3.7 flops badly...
>The 3.9 Works!!....why mess with a good thing
>
>
>I'll take on a 3.7 with my 3.9,and dust e'm
>
>
>David Digney
>00'Dakota Quad Cab 3.9 R/T
>42RE,3.55,K&N "Home-Brew" Intake
>Dynomax Super Turbo,Mobil 1 10w30,Mobil 1 Filter
>List Moderator: "DodgeDakotaQuadCab@egroups.com"
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:12 EDT