RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Crane roller rockers

From: Ronald Wong (ron-wong@home.com)
Date: Sun May 06 2001 - 02:59:40 EDT


That's fine. I just want you to be aware of it. I don't know anything
about the 5.0's. I know with the Magnum valve covers they sit taller and
the baffles for the vent hoses are only on the corners and they are flat so
they shouldn't get in the way. As for the gaskets Will was right. If it's
the kind with silicone on both sides and metal in the middle they're
reusable. If you decide to get the Magnum covers they come with a new set.
Also, if you get the new set the PCV hose won't fit correctly. You'll need
to get a longer hose.

Ron
00 PB SLT QC 4X2 5.9 46RE 3.92 LSD
For modifications see my DML Profile (URL follows)
http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/Kw9pV1EkFeOYY

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Kevin
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 10:41 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Crane roller rockers

Thanks Ron, I did not know I needed new gaskets, but I understand I have to
remove the baffles on the valve covers. I had to do the same thing to my 5.0
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ronald Wong" <ron-wong@home.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 7:19 AM
Subject: DML: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Crane roller rockers

> You need new gaskets, but that's not your big problem. You need the
Magnum
> valve covers otherwise your new rockers are gonna rock on the baffles of
> your current valve covers.
>
> Ron
> 00 PB SLT QC 4X2 5.9 46RE 3.92 LSD
> For modifications see my DML Profile (URL follows)
> http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/Kw9pV1EkFeOYY
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Kevin
> Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 3:18 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Re: RE: Re: RE: Crane roller rockers
>
>
> Thanks for all the advice with the rockers. I ordered the 1.7's yesterday.
> Do Dak's have re-usable valve cover gaskets, or do I need to get new ones?
> THIS should be the last question.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wisotzkey, Rich" <Rich.Wisotzkey@gd-wts.com>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 1:14 AM
> Subject: DML: RE: Re: RE: Crane roller rockers
>
>
> > Hi Kevin,
> > I changed both. The geometry is slightly different from the stock
setup.
> > The pushrods for the roller rockers are .070" shorter than the stock
> length.
> > I did a little checking, and it appeared you could probably get away
with
> > using the stock length pushrods. But the pushrods that come with the
> roller
> > set are Chromemoly steel. Much stronger than the stock ones.
> >
> > The Crane part number for the "Energizer" rocker set is 11746-16. Same
> set
> > from Mopar is P5249800. Hope this helps. Let me know if you have any
> other
> > questions.
> > Rich
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kevin [mailto:ksmith@korea.com]
> > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:44 AM
> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > Subject: DML: Re: RE: Crane roller rockers
> >
> >
> > Rich did you change push rods or keep the stock rods?
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Wisotzkey, Rich" <Rich.Wisotzkey@gd-wts.com>
> > To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:38 PM
> > Subject: DML: RE: Crane roller rockers
> >
> >
> > > Kevin,
> > > Yeah, I've been using them. They work nice, no complaints. I just
> > recently
> > > found out the Mopar roller rockers are Crane roller rockers.
> > > Rich - Ashburn, VA
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kevin [mailto:ksmith@korea.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 7:02 PM
> > > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > > Subject: DML: Crane roller rockers
> > >
> > >
> > > Anybody running either the 1.6 or 1.7 ratio Crane roller rockers on
> their
> > > magnum engines? Any problems with installation? Thanks for any info
> > >
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:25 EDT