I wouldn't be to concern in bleeding them dry but what I see over the near
horizon (10-15 years), is a great change in our energy change from oil base
to other technology. Thus, leaving there economies in ruin, since they are
heavily depended on oil crude money. Maybe, a return to the Nomad life
versus the 100 million ruble mansion. hehehehe
--------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
System Engineer (IOW/IOS-NT)
PSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
(Work) 760-725-2506 (DSN: 365)
(Work) mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
(Home) mailto:saint1958@home.com
"In fact, my work has already proven
itself to be correct. People such
as you just haven't gotten it yet.
(unknown author)
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard A Pyburn [mailto:rap777@juno.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:15 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: United States Policy
I agree with you completely, Paul!
On Wed, 9 May 2001 13:53:57 -0400 (EDT) Paul Macey <pmacey@ans.net>
writes:
> I'm a firm believer it is United States Policy to bleed the middle
> east > dry of all their reserves (at a cost obviously) then start using
> our> reserves, stockpiles, and then really get concerned about opening
> new> wells and refineries.
>
> BTW, what use to cost $4 to find a barrel of oil is now down to 60
> cents...invest in them oil stocks, friends!
>
>
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:27 EDT