I thought about that as well so I ordered in a 94-96 rack to see what the
difference was. Looked exactly the same. There was no physical difference
between the two but different part #'s. So after work today I went ahead
and intalled it. When right is no problem. If there is a difference in the
ratio I didn't notice. I guess a guy would have to try a 92 then jump into
a 95 and see it he noticed a difference.
Dave R
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 2:24:11 -0700
From: "David Medeiros" <orange383@earthlink.net>
Subject: RE: DML: Rack and Pinion, difference between 91-93 and 94-96?
If I remember correctly, it has something to do with the lines being shaped
and routed differently. I believe the rack itself is the same.
David
> [Original Message]
> From: Robertson <jrobert@voyageur.ca>
> To: <dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET>
> Date: 8/7/01 6:43:28 PM
> Subject: DML: Rack and Pinion, difference between 91-93 and 94-96?
>
> Need a new rack for my 92 Dak and decided I'd try to get a high ratio
rack.
> Does anyone know the difference between a 91-93 and 94-96 rack. They
carry
> different part # but why? Dealer didn't have a clue!
>
> Dave R
> 92 Dak 5.2
> 71 Demon 340
>
------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:23 EDT