RE: Re:Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone

From: David Medeiros (orange383@earthlink.net)
Date: Sat Sep 22 2001 - 02:28:53 EDT


<Seriously, the Gen IIs look like rangers or
older...<cough, hack, cough>S-10s. Must
be that funny box shape. Heck just throw
a bowtie on it. ;-p

(headed to the bomb shelter).>

You know, people have been killed for less than this! ;)

> [Original Message]
> From: George S Willhite <gswillhite@ualr.edu>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Date: 9/21/01 1:04:37 PM
> Subject: DML: Re:Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone
>
> Seriously, the Gen IIs look like rangers or
> older...<cough, hack, cough>S-10s. Must
> be that funny box shape. Heck just throw
> a bowtie on it. ;-p
>
> (headed to the bomb shelter).
>
> GS -
>
> '98 5.2L 5spd.
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Justus Stull" <aerojust@yahoo.com>
> > To: "Dak Mail List" <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:33 AM
> > Subject: DML: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone
> >
> >
> > > Im running away for the weekend, but I think that
> > the
> > > Gen II looks superior to the Gen III. What do you
> > > guys think.........????
> > >
> > > The Gen III looks to much like something,Idunno.
> > I
> > > like trucks that look like trucks. I guess I will
> > > have to keep my Gen II until the wheels fall off.
> > >
>
>
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:53 EDT