heheheheh If you say so but I still think they were butt ugly. My Dad
bought one the first year they came out. Not only ugly but that damn thing
was a hunk of junk.
Karsh
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of Mark Haney
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:54 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re: RE: Re: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone
Gen I's and Gen II's are NOT ugly!
(they're just not a good looking as the Gen III's, that's all)
Mark Haney
'00 CC 4x4 4.7 5sp 3.92 LSD
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karsh" <karsh@cox-internet.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:12 PM
Subject: DML: RE: Re: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone
> DOn't get me wrong I'm glad the gen I and gen II guys like their trucks.
> But my personal opinion was that until the gen III's came out there was no
> way Id own one of those ugly Dakota's.
>
>
> Karsh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of Jason Banta
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 2:45 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Re: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone
>
>
> I agree whole heartedly.
>
> Jason Banta
> 01 QC SLT 4.7l 4x4
> Patriot Blue Two Tone
>
> >>> adam_is_mr_plow@hotmail.com 09/21/01 01:02PM >>>
> Well, when i look at my Dak, it has a really agressive stance, more so
than
> any other 4x4 i've seen from the factory, and besides, you couldn't get
> Patriot Blue from the factory for a GenII. hehe
>
>
>
> The Adam Blaster
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:53 EDT