Re[2]: Re: passed 200K in my '95 DAK

From: Michael Clark (mike@mikesdakota.com)
Date: Tue Sep 25 2001 - 01:43:30 EDT

Next message: Kenneth M. Berntsen: "RE: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone"
Previous message: AWyseGuy@aol.com: "Re: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone"
In reply to: Richard A Pyburn: "Re: Re: passed 200K in my '95 DAK"
Next in thread: Richard A Pyburn: "Re: Re[2]: Re: passed 200K in my '95 DAK"
Maybe reply: Richard A Pyburn: "Re: Re[2]: Re: passed 200K in my '95 DAK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Uhh, I prefer my '95 to my '93. Not saying the '93 was a slouch by any
> means, but the '95 is a tad sweeter.

> richard pyburn

Well, yeah considering your '93 is a bit "toasty" now I'd agree with
that! ;-)

See ya in Oct.

--Mike
www.mikesdakota.com

Next message: Kenneth M. Berntsen: "RE: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone"
Previous message: AWyseGuy@aol.com: "Re: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone"
In reply to: Richard A Pyburn: "Re: Re: passed 200K in my '95 DAK"
Next in thread: Richard A Pyburn: "Re: Re[2]: Re: passed 200K in my '95 DAK"
Maybe reply: Richard A Pyburn: "Re: Re[2]: Re: passed 200K in my '95 DAK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:57 EDT