RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone

From: Kenneth M. Berntsen (kenneth@berntsen.cc)
Date: Tue Sep 25 2001 - 08:49:02 EDT


Hmmm....

Well there's more than a couple guys that have forked over the cash to
convert their Daks around here. I know I've seen two on the streets and
was looking at one on a used car lot.

-----Original Message-----
From: Will Coughlin [mailto:willcoughlin@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:57 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks
alone

Hey Kenneth, The Gen-II 4x4's are IFS as well! There never was a
factory-built solid-axle Dakota, sorry!

Will Coughlin willcoughlin@hotmail.com
'00 reg.cab,2wd,4.7L/NV-3500HD5-spd/3.92sg(9.25")
http://www.geocities.com/willcoughlin/index.html

----Original Message Follows----
From: "Kenneth M. Berntsen" <kenneth@berntsen.cc>
Subject: DML: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 22:59:15 -0500

I'll tell ya the one thing that makes the Gen II look really sweet (when
compared to a gen III) is the solid front axel on the 4x4. None of that
IFS wanna be 4x4 stuff.

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:57 EDT