Re: Redline MTL or MT-90

From: jay & dana (jay&dana@telus.net)
Date: Tue Sep 25 2001 - 17:27:53 EDT

Next message: Andy Levy: "Re: Light bar on my Dak"
Previous message: John_Neff@Dell.com: "OT: It's offical.... no more F-body"
Maybe in reply to: jay & dana: "Redline MTL or MT-90"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Thanks Bill, I understand now, MTL it is.

Jay

-----Original Message-----
From: SEMIHEMI01@aol.com <SEMIHEMI01@aol.com>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: September 25, 2001 3:53 AM
Subject: Re: DML: Redline MTL or MT-90

>Jay,
> MTL is what RedLine themselves recommend for our 5 spds. I have an
e-mail
>from them on that very Question. Also MTL has no reactive Sulfur in it's
>composition to pit the synchronizers in the tranny. This is very critical
in
>a Dodge transmission. Bill
>
>SEMIHEMI01@AOL.COM> KB SuperCharged, 4.7L, 2001, QC,
>http://hometown.aol.com/semihemi01

Next message: Andy Levy: "Re: Light bar on my Dak"
Previous message: John_Neff@Dell.com: "OT: It's offical.... no more F-body"
Maybe in reply to: jay & dana: "Redline MTL or MT-90"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:58 EDT