the 2.2 and 2.5 are very different motors, and a 2.2 will moke a K car or a
sundance fairly well but not a dakota, especially with the choked down
emissions ridden carb set up on it. my 88 had a 2V holley
Greg Conner
1993 RC Dakota Sport
3.9L 5speed
15.4 @89
>From: "Kenneth M. Berntsen" <kenneth@berntsen.cc>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Subject: RE: DML: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone
>Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 22:53:13 -0500
>
>Yeah I had a Gen I with the 2.5 before I got the Gen II with the 3.9.
>You rev the S--t out of it and it will definately get that truck going.
>Not quite like a 6 or 8 will but definately faster than S10s or Rangers.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: AWyseGuy@aol.com [mailto:AWyseGuy@aol.com]
>Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:38 PM
>To: aol@dakota-truck.net
>Subject: Re: DML: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone
>
>
>In a message dated 9/24/2001 5:53:05 PM Central Daylight Time,
>dodgeboy93@hotmail.com writes:
>
>
> >
> > exactly mike...premag for life...you think you have it bad..I had an
>88
> > with
> >
>
>Easy on the 2.2L's.. I'm on my 3rd 2.2 car and my 1st turbo model.. and
>both
>my Daks have been the 2.5 based off it. I can rarely catch 3rd gear;
>but I
>more than easily get out of my way.. and on top of anyone in my way.
>Especially Rangers & S10's.
>
>Aaron W in AL
>
>94 RC WS 2.5L 5spd
>95 RC Sport 2.5L 5 Spd
>86 Shelby Charger Turbo
>
>Aaron W in AL
>
>94 RC WS 2.5L 5spd
>95 RC Sport 2.5L 5 Spd
>86 Shelby Charger Turbo
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:00 EDT