Re: was 2002 Dakota..confused! now 354 hemi

From: RDPerform@aol.com
Date: Thu Sep 27 2001 - 19:59:29 EDT

Next message: RDPerform@aol.com: "Re: Re: RE: whats the difference?? TB, chpi, IAT etc...."
Previous message: RDPerform@aol.com: "Re: whats the difference?? TBs!!!!!!!"
Maybe in reply to: Jim Miller: "was 2002 Dakota..confused! now 354 hemi"
Next in thread: H62300@aol.com: "Re: was 2002 Dakota..confused! now 354 hemi"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated 9/4/01 9:15:29 PM, jim76712@swbell.net writes:

<< Is this 354 CID the same size (but not the same engine) as once used in the
early Chrysler, DeSoto Dodge cars in the 50 and early 60s? That number sounds
familiar. >>

The early Hemi's were 334's I believe. :) Give or take a few.

ttyl
Patrick

Next message: RDPerform@aol.com: "Re: Re: RE: whats the difference?? TB, chpi, IAT etc...."
Previous message: RDPerform@aol.com: "Re: whats the difference?? TBs!!!!!!!"
Maybe in reply to: Jim Miller: "was 2002 Dakota..confused! now 354 hemi"
Next in thread: H62300@aol.com: "Re: was 2002 Dakota..confused! now 354 hemi"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:01 EDT