Then buy JAPANESE, End of Story.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan G." <gogglesqq@home.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Never again with a Dakota
> Im backing these guys up. This truck has been crap through and through.
> Sure is gorgeous to look at though. Next time around i'll be buying a
Ford.
> Chevy styling has gone down the crapper and so has Chrysler quality.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Suter, Rick <RSuter@bizfon.com>
> To: <dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET>
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:32 PM
> Subject: Re: DML: Never again with a Dakota
>
>
> I gotta second this one... My '99 is absolutely the worst vehicle I have
> ever owned, BY FAR! And it appears, I am not alone... After owning Mopars
> exclusively since 1973 (less two shortlived GMs) my brand loyalty may have
> run out. And it's not the fact that things are wrong that need to
corrected
> with the truck that bothers me the most. What bothers me the most is that
> Chrysler seems UNABLE to fix the truck. Unfortunately, I am not eligible
for
> my state's lemon law because I bought it with 16k on the clock used from a
> dealer.
>
> Anyone want to buy a Mopar Performance PCM with a '99 Dakota attached? :-)
>
> >Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 10:46:35 US/Central
> >From: bernd@texas.net
> >Subject: Re: DML: Never again with a Dakota
> >
> >Did you ever try to investigate using the Lemon Law? You may >>have been
> one of
> >the unfortunate ones with a "Lemon" right out of the factory.
>
> >They're not bad trucks and every manufacturer has a "black eye" >vehicle.
> Just
> >sucks when it happens to you.
>
> >- - Bernd
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:15 EDT