Aaron,
The MAP sensor isn't the problem. The problem is the way the computer is
programmed to interpret the sensor readings. To bad the computer can't be
purchased in an "Artificial Intelligence" model.
Rich - Ashburn, VA
-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Gasparich [mailto:acg302@ptd.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 5:00 PM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: DML: Re: Re: vacum
Is there a map sensor for a vehicle that normally makes 11" of vacum?
-Aaron G
"Shane Moseley" <smoseley@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:3BE1C33F.1F303FEC@ix.netcom.com...
> "Wisotzkey, Rich" wrote:
>
> > Hi Bernd,
> > Well, right now it is a small box about 3" long (including connectors),
> > about 1.5" wide, and about .5" thick. I am currently using GM
connectors on
> >
>
> <snip>
>
> > What does the "MAP Adjuster" look like?
> >
> > - Bernd
>
> Hey guys - how about adding the ability to run a much cheaper alternate
map
> sensor?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shane
>
> --
> '96 IndyRam-HisIndy-MPI TB Pulleys RTcam MPComp HVoilpump
DynaGearDoubleRoller
> WindageTray CompTAs
> '96 IndyRam-HerIndy-numbered(#142)"Track Truck"
> '74 Triple-Black Dodge Challenger Rallye 360 EFI R&D vehicle
> '93 Dakota LE CC 318 - newest acquisition
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:27 EDT