Re: RE: Flowmaster opinions?

From: Punch (2punch.crash2000@rogers.com)
Date: Tue Feb 05 2002 - 16:08:41 EST


yep JBA is the only one makeing headers for our V6's.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Esler, Joel SGT" <joel.esler@us.army.mil>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 8:23 AM
Subject: DML: RE: Flowmaster opinions?

> i have a 3.9L V6 2000 dak sport... anyone make headers for this thing?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of Skelley99@aol.com
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 12:50 AM
> To: aol@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: DML: Flowmaster opinions?
>
>
> Sorry..i checked the archives and wasnt having much luck. Maybe i just
dont
> know how to do it. Anyway.&nbsp; I have 97 V6 with JBA headers and 3
chamber
> flowmaster.&nbsp; I bought a 2 chamber from ebay the other day and before
i
> got it i cut off my catalytic converter ( it was completely clogged,
making
> my truck run bad with little power and i couldnt even hear my flowmaster
and
> it was overheating my truck as well.) Anyway, when i cut off the converter
> it
> made it SOOO much louder. But i like it. I was wondering if the 2 chamber
> would sound like crap with JBA headers, no converter, and dual pipes
running
> out the back. With the 2 chamber would i loose any depth to the
sound?&nbsp;
> I think it sounds great with the 3 chamber but louder is always good if it
> still has the depth..... i would appreciate any feedback, especially with
> those who have tried the 2 chamber on a V6 with headers.
>
>
> TIA
>
> Steven Kelley
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:57 EDT