I thought there was a joint venture with the third tier manufacture of
DaimlerChrysler - meaning Mitsubishi. It was a mixture of both brands
combining into a small truck market and dropping the Dakota, since the new
pricing of the Ram will provide the void.
--------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
C4i System Engineer
C4i Engineering Branch, PSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, U.S. Marine Corps
Office (760) 725-2506 (DSN Prefix: 365)
"Never be content with somebody else definition
of you. Instead, define yourself by your own beliefs,
your own truths, your own understanding of who
you are. Never be content until you are happy with
the unique person GOD has created you to be."
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard A Pyburn [mailto:rap777@juno.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:15 AM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: No M-80 after all?
Interesting article at www.scatpack.com today. It's from Automotive news
and states that DC's new policy is to not consider building any concept
vehicle that can't sell 100,000 units a year, PVO excepted.
It's the fourth article on today's news, if you're interested. Wonder if
this gives the Dakota a reprieve?
Richard
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:04:26 EDT