LOL!! A guy with patience!! ;o)
Sounds like me ... hehehe ... but I too went with the Fastman 52mm TB. I've
got the shaker, headers, MBRP catback, and IAT adjuster. Shaker's not on
right now but I am running its round K&N element and Xstream filterlid. I
can't compare to how it would perform against a 50mm TB but I have not been
disappointed with the way the 52mm works for me.
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Dave" <ded74@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: DML: Re: TBs 50mm or 52mm?
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 10:56:25 -0400
Nevermind, just ordered the Fastman 52mm :)
-- Dave Bensalem, PA '02 R/T RC Flame Red""Dave"" <ded74@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:ac0c8q$a5v$1@bent.twistedbits.net... > > I'm gonna talk to the guys at B&G about a pcm flash, but I'm also looking at > getting a new throttle body. The only mod I have right now is an edelbrock > air cleaner, which will soon be replaced by a shaker hood. I've read that > 52mm TBs are best for heavily modded engines, how are they on stock engines? > I ask because I plan on getting either a supercharger or maybe Bernd's twin > turbo setup within the next year and I'd prefer to not have to buy another > TB. So, should I get the 50mm for now and upgrade again later, or just get > the 52mm now and then I'll have it for the s/c or turbos? > > -- > Dave > Bensalem, PA > '02 R/T RC Flame Red > > >
_________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:04:33 EDT