Absolutely, the exhaust is one of many mods that will be done to my baby.
I've already done a IP intake and 50mm TB, along with 3923's, 8.5mm MSD
wires, BW cap/rotor and 180 t-stat. I'm also getting a B&G M1 flash next
week (and then of course the M1 as soon as I can). I think I'm going to go
3" throughout, a lot of R/T guys I've talked to have had good luck with
that. Best time with the intake and TB was 15.04 @ 90.05. I think I could
have easily been in the 14's, it was my first time ever at a track, did a
lot of spinning. I think with some more practice I'll be in the 14's and
then with the exhaust and flash I should be solidly in the 14's. After I
get the M1, I think I'll be done for a lil while, need to start saving for
Bernd's twin turbo setup :) Back on the exhaust thread, bigger tips make
the sound deeper, right? I found some pretty nice rolled tips from carriage
works, they have 3" and 4", would the 4" be overkill? :)
-- Dave Bensalem, PA '02 R/T RC Flame Red""Canucker Trucker"" <mal5@ualberta.ca> wrote in message news:adg4un$c97$1@bent.twistedbits.net... > > <<snip>> either going to be a > 3" in/dual 2.5" out or a 3" in/3" out with a split just past the axle to > dual tips (saw some pics of a guy that did that in the same style I want, > GTS style, both pipes exiting right under the license plate next to each > other). Does anyone know if there's any performance difference between > these two setups? <<snip >> > > Also, on this note, I have read a marginal (<2hp) increase in performance > from the one in/ one out mufflers VS the one in/ two out. Such a small gain > for me isn't justified in the cost of buying another muffler ... if a guy > ran true duals, that's a different story. > > But one has to always keep in mind that the exhaust is only one minor > modification and you can't expect a 14 second truck just from making the > change. > > -- > Canuck > -------------------------------------------- > Y2K 4.7L 2wd 5spd > > > > ""Dave"" <ded74@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:adg141$7ob$1@bent.twistedbits.net... > > > > Ok, I just got off the phone with a Flowmaster tech and he said that my > > stock R/T Muffler is louder than a 40 series, I find that very hard to > > believe. Do I need to run glasspacks to get louder? LOL Or is he just > > smoking crack? > > > > -- > > Dave > > Bensalem, PA > > '02 R/T RC Flame Red > > > > "Paul Macey" <pmacey@ans.net> wrote in message > > news:Pine.GSO.4.40.0206031100420.18390-100000@paul.ny.ans.net... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Canucker Trucker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > ""Dave"" <ded74@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > > > news:adflnj$ur4$1@bent.twistedbits.net... > > > > > > > > > > Did you get the 50 series Delta Flow or SUV? I'm still shopping > > around > > > > for > > > > > a muffler for my custom duals I'll be getting. I've heard mpg's of > > both > > > > the > > > > > 40 and the 50, the 50 seemed to have a lil bit deeper tone, which is > > what > > > > > I'm looking for, I want a good muscle car rumble. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Dave > > > > > Bensalem, PA > > > > > '02 R/T RC Flame Red > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dave, > > > > I've been asking myself the same question and I decided what I'm going > > to > > > > order today. Basically, from what I gather, the 40 series original is > > the > > > > loudest in the flowmaster line. The 40 delta flow is a bit quieter, > but > > > > offers a bit more flow resistance for some back pressure that's needed > > for > > > > the low end torque. I believe the 50 series are a bit quieter yet > from > > the > > > > 40 series and has more flow resistance yet (but can accomodate more > CFMs > > for > > > > larger displ. engines). Anyways, I'm ordering a 40 series original > > today > > > > with a single 3" inlet and dual 2 1/4" outlets. My biggest debate was > > > > deciding between the original and delta flow series.... I basically > went > > > > with the original cause my sound preference overruled all. I suspect > the > > > > delta flow would be a bit better for performance, but it's probably a > > > > marginal difference. I guess the 40 is pretty loud and rumbly. I'm > > young > > > > and stupid, so loud is good ... right! > > > > > > > > hope that sheds a little more light on the picture! > > > > > > > > > I talked to two different techs at Flowmaster, said I wanted a muffler > > > that would flow the best with most HP/TQ gains for a 2001 4.7, not too > > > worried about in cabin noise, and both pointed me to the SUV 50 Series > > > muffler. It has one of their largest casings for more flow. > > > > > > I have it on my truck with dual 2 1/2 inch mandrell bent pipes (get > these > > > -vs- press bent) dumping into 4 inch angle-cut tips...sounds great and > > > indeed has some nice throttle response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > :) > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Canuck > > > > -------------------------------------------- > > > > Y2K 4.7L 2wd 5spd > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:04:41 EDT