I stand corrected.
My hat is off to you. Not many people would go the extra mile to back up
what they say. You made a good argument and backed it up. Its nice to see
that.
I enjoyed this debate. I hope there are no hard feelings :)
Gary Hedlin
"The Crazy Quadraplegic"
ghedlin@theramp.net (business)
ragingquad@yahoo.com (personal)
**Also Webmaster For**
http://garyhedlin.com
http://socaldakota.com
http://scsilverdak.com
http://assistivetechnologies.com
...And Many More!
"Andy Levy" <andylevy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3D0AA4C7.2000703@yahoo.com...
>
> Gary Hedlin wrote:
>
> > WRONG- You've got a lot of work to do to defend yourself.
>
> If you must...
> Copyright Law of the United States of America and Related Laws Contained
> in Title 17 of the United States Code - http://www.copyright.gov/title17/
>
> US Copyright Office - http://www.loc.gov/copyright/
>
> From http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html -
>
> "Copyright is a form of protection provided by the laws of the United
> States (title 17, U.S. Code) to the authors of "original works of
> authorship," including literary, dramatic, musical, artistic, and
> certain other intellectual works. This protection is available to both
> published and unpublished works. Section 106 of the 1976 Copyright Act
> generally gives the owner of copyright the exclusive right to do and to
> authorize others to do the following:
>
> To reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords;
>
> To prepare derivative works based upon the work;
>
> To distribute copies or phonorecords of the work to the public by sale
> or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending;
>
> To perform the work publicly, in the case of literary, musical,
> dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and
> other audiovisual works;
>
> To display the copyrighted work publicly, in the case of literary,
> musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial,
> graphic, or sculptural works, including the individual images of a
> motion picture or other audiovisual work; and
> In the case of sound recordings, to perform the work publicly by means
> of a digital audio transmission."
>
> IOW, copyright law says that DC can dictate anything and everything
> regarding how the work is distributed. If DC says you can't do
> something with the book, then doing it without DC's authorization is a
> violation of copyright. How much clearer does one have to make it?
>
> IMO, *you* are the one who needs to "defend yourself" - how are you NOT
> in violation of copyright law if you do what you've described earlier
today?
>
> --
> -andy
> andylevy@yahoo.com
> Maintainer, DML FAQ - http://www.dakota-truck.net/faq/
> http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/dakota/
> '99 CC 4x4 318 auto
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:04:46 EDT