You mean 10 HP more than 5.9L....but then, they never came out with a HO
version of the 5.9.
--------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
C4i System Engineer
C4i Engineering Branch, PSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, U.S. Marine Corps
Office (760) 725-2506 (DSN Prefix: 365)
"Never be content with somebody else definition
of you. Instead, define yourself by your own beliefs,
your own truths, your own understanding of who
you are. Never be content until you are happy with
the unique person GOD has created you to be."
-----Original Message-----
From: Carter, Brian [mailto:brian.carter@texian.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 6:51 AM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: RE: Re: swapping a 5.2 for a 4.7 or 4.7HO
"It would be cheaper" because of availability / demand, or because it is
an easier swap with less attachments and adapters to make the
conversion?
I'm not tied to the 4.7, although I like the one I have a lot. As I
recall though, the 5.9 really doesn't offer that much over the 4.7 or
5.2 in terms of torque or HP...it just uses more gas. Isn't the 4.7HO
only like 10HP less than the 5.9?
Thanks,
BTC
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom "Slick" North [mailto:prodog@swbell.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 2:51 AM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: Re: swapping a 5.2 for a 4.7 or 4.7HO
it would probably be cheaper to go with a 5.9L than a 4.7L...
Later,
Tom "Slick"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:05:19 EDT