RE: RE: The 4.7L HO Cams Saga Continues, I Give Up!!

From: William H. Hiatt III (william@hiatt.net)
Date: Thu Sep 19 2002 - 10:07:56 EDT


They're the HO cams, I know, I helped him install them

william

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net] On Behalf Of Bernd D.
Ratsch
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 7:00 AM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: RE: The 4.7L HO Cams Saga Continues, I Give Up!!

Ed,

Were these the "HO" cams or the "EHO" cams from Jonas?

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net] On Behalf Of Olznut@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:06 AM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net; 47performance@yahoogroups.com;
matt_barret@earthtech.com
Subject: DML: The 4.7L HO Cams Saga Continues, I Give Up!!

Put in new FMS 21lb inj tonight, the damn prob is still there. The only
thing
I can think of now is the cams itself. Maybe the dowell pin on the cams
to
line up the sprockets is in the wrong spot, advancing the timing or some

crap, I don't know, but I'm pissed. What a waste of time and money ($300
in
inj, $150 for the cams and 10 gals @ $5 per gal of 100 octane gas) this
has
been.Throughout the pinging, the falling on it's face, man, it ain't
worth it
no more. I give up. Stock stuff goes back in before this weekend. As a
side
note, the new inj do make it run smoother. Jonas, can we talk?? Promise
I
won't take your head of :) Maybe we can try something....... Any
thoughts??

Ed "Olznut" Halterman



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:05:22 EDT