Re: bugbear virus alert

From: Mike Meyerhoff (mike@mypants.org)
Date: Sun Oct 27 2002 - 21:37:56 EST


I got an this email with the virus as an attachment.

From: "Dave" <ded74@twistedbits.net>
Subject: Re: DML: Re: Re: Checking u-joints?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------C93KV4ZY2KDVAEZ"
Message-Id:
<20021026155322.QDMA20156.mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net@oemcomputer>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:53:45 +0000
Bcc:
Return-Path: ded74@twistedbits.net
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Oct 2002 16:54:18.0466 (UTC)
FILETIME=[7D60B420:01C27DD9]

------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "andy levy" <andylevy@yahoo.com>
To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: DML: bugbear virus alert

>
> It came through someone who is on the DML, or was on it at one time, but
> IIRC, it couldn't have come through the DML itself because attachments
> are blocked.
>
> Vic wrote:
> > Just wanted to let you know Norton caught the bugbear virus. I'm not
the
> > best at reading email transcripts, but looks like it came through the
DML.
> > Here is the virus info:
> >
> >
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.bugbear@mm.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Here is the header:
> >
> >
> > Received: from txmx01.mgw.rr.com ([24.93.35.210]) by mail.satx.rr.com
with
> > Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75);
> > Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:53:42 -0600
> > Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net
> > [204.127.131.115])
> > by txmx01.mgw.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g9RGrfZ7016208
> > for <ib4x4@satx.rr.com>; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:53:42 -0600 (CST)
> > Received: from oemcomputer ([12.86.14.144]) by
mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net
> > (InterMail vM.5.01.05.12 201-253-122-126-112-20020820) with
SMTP
> > id
> > <20021026155322.QDMA20156.mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net@oemcomputer>;
> > Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:53:22 +0000
> > From: "Dave" <ded74@twistedbits.net>
> > Subject: Re: DML: Re: Re: Checking u-joints?
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----------C93KV4ZY2KDVAEZ"
> > Message-Id:
> > <20021026155322.QDMA20156.mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net@oemcomputer>
> > X-Unapproved: Unapproved_multipart
> > Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:53:45 +0000
> > Bcc:
> >
> >
> >
> > Here was the message:
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave [mailto:ded74@twistedbits.net]
> > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 10:54 AM
> > Subject: Re: DML: Re: Re: Checking u-joints?
> > Importance: High
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > X-Unapproved: Unapproved_multipart
> > Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:28:20 -0400
> > From: "John"
> > Subject: Re: DML: Re: Re: Checking u-joints?
> >
> > Oh, I forgot, while your under the truck also check your rear tranny
mount.
> > You said the squeak was right underneath you, with that many miles, and
if
> > it isn't the u-joints that could be a possibility.
> > Take Care & Keep On Truckin'~~~~~John
> > <<'96 Dakota Sport 4x4, 3.9L 5spd>>
> > - ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dave"
> >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:18 EST