Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Factory twin turbo V10 Dak ( the answer)

From: Mike Meyerhoff (mike@mypants.org)
Date: Fri Nov 01 2002 - 21:40:27 EST

Next message: Danny L. Burrows: "Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Factory twin turbo V10 Dak ( the answer)"
Previous message: Jason Bleazard: "Re: No DML Calendar this year?"
In reply to: andy levy: "Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Factory twin turbo V10 Dak ( the answer)"
Next in thread: Danny L. Burrows: "Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Factory twin turbo V10 Dak ( the answer)"
Reply: Danny L. Burrows: "Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Factory twin turbo V10 Dak ( the answer)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Its about time, the Viper realy needed an extra 0.3 liters.

> The pre-2003 engines are all 488 cubes (8.0L). For 2003, the Viper gets
> 500 (8.3L) cubes. Don't know if that's carried into the truck engine.
>

Next message: Danny L. Burrows: "Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Factory twin turbo V10 Dak ( the answer)"
Previous message: Jason Bleazard: "Re: No DML Calendar this year?"
In reply to: andy levy: "Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Factory twin turbo V10 Dak ( the answer)"
Next in thread: Danny L. Burrows: "Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Factory twin turbo V10 Dak ( the answer)"
Reply: Danny L. Burrows: "Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Factory twin turbo V10 Dak ( the answer)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:24 EST