RE: Re: RE: Question about retreving trouble codes

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Wed Dec 18 2002 - 09:13:36 EST


Yeah...it's funny though. My SnapOn MT2500 doesn't pull the codes
(unless in generic mode which doesn't show everything all the time) but
my "Cheapy" Actron scanner does. (Go figure) ;)

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of
ScSilverdak
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 7:55 AM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: Re: RE: Question about retreving trouble codes

I've already pulled a code on a '03 model, OBD II scanner worked on
it.........

Ron-
'01 Dakota Sport 3.9 Supercharged
website: http://www.scsilverdak.com
e-mail: scsilverdak@hotmail.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:47 AM
Subject: DML: RE: Question about retreving trouble codes

>
> 2003 models are still new. Waiting on the service procedures (don't
> think the ON/OFF method will work, but maybe they built something easy

> into the new systems).
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Jon
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 6:17 AM
> To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
> Subject: DML: Question about retreving trouble codes
>
>
>
> I thought that in all Chrysler vehicles you could get the trouble
> codes by turning the key on/off three times. This works in my Dakota.

> I bought the wife a 2003 Jeep Liberty Limited on Nov. 29 and I can't
> get the on/off trick to work. At least it doesn't display any codes
> and it doesn't say "P done" like my Dakota. Anyone have any knowledge

> on this?
>
> I don't have any problems with the Jeep, I'm just curious. LOVE IT
> btw!!!
> --
> Jon Slavic
> 2000 CC Intense Blue 4x4 4.7L V8
> jons@laserdrive.com
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:48:14 EST