Re: Re: 3.55 vs. 3.92

From: ScSilverdak (scsilverdak@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Dec 24 2002 - 22:13:37 EST


Tim......

what size tire are you running with the 4:10's........
.......just curious as to what the final drive ratio is after factoring the
tire size in.

Ron-
'01 Dakota Sport 3.9 Supercharged
website: http://www.scsilverdak.com
e-mail: scsilverdak@hotmail.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Berry" <coolva1@cox.net>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 9:44 PM
Subject: DML: Re: 3.55 vs. 3.92

>
> I went from 3.55's to 4.10's...
>
> heres a conversion to see what you'd tach...
>
> at 25MPH w/ 4.10's, its the same as going 29 w/ 3.55's
> 35/41
> 45/52
> 55/64
> 60/70
> 65/76
> 70/82
> 75/88
>
> at 85MPH w/ the 4.10's I'm at 3000RPMs, and I have a pretty healty 360 in
my
> truck... and the 4.10's didnt affect the highway MPG more than 1MPG i dont
> think....
>
> I hope this helps your decision...
>
> Tim Berry - Chesapeake, VA
> 97 CC 360 Auto 4300lbs
> best ET to date: 13.03@103.76
>
>
>
> >
> > Hi gang. My Dak has now made it into the high 15's at Fontana, CA. The
> last
> > thing I'm thinking of doing is going from 3.55 gearset to 3.92 in the
> > rearend. Any ideas as to what difference that would make to e.t.? I
> would
> > consider 4.10 but I think gas mileage would REALLY go to hell with it.
It
> IS
> > my driver, after all. :-)
> >
> > Tom
> > '98 CC 5.2 auto 3.55 limited slip.
> > FIPK, Mopar computer, JBA headers and Y pipe, 3 inch Magnaflow cat back.
> > Trans-go shift kit, 3923's and Mopar Perf cap, rotor and wires.
> > Hotchkis (2-3 drop) and Bilsteins
> >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:48:15 EST