Re: 9" Rear In A Dak

From: jon@dakota-truck.net
Date: Tue Jan 07 2003 - 00:04:31 EST


Danny Burrows <havenx@ksni.net> wrote:

: Umm Dakota already seem to have pretty good rear ends, why bother.

   Not if you plan on crankin' any real power through 'em; especially
so for Bill, his '95 no doubt has an 8.25" rear and he is dropping in a
pretty hot 408 stroker. My '96 Dak has already torn the 8.25" up
once, and my truck only runs mid 14s. (Granted, I do have a stick
which is harder on 'em than an auto, but still...)

  The 9.25" became available in Daks around 97-98 which is certainly
better than the 8.25" but still not quite up to task; the Mopar 8.75"
or the Ford 9" are both much stronger than either of the stock Dak
rears. (There's also the Dana 60 of course, but you take a pretty
hefty weight penalty with that beast at the strip.)

  For the vast majority of Dak owners, you are correct, the stock
rears are just fine - but there are some 1%ers out there that need
more. :-)

-- 

-Jon-

.---- Jon Steiger ------ jon@dakota-truck.net or jon@jonsteiger.com ------. | I'm the: AOPA, DoD, EAA, NMA, NRA, SPA, USUA. Rec & UL Pilot - SEL | | 70 Cuda, 90 Dak 'vert, 92 Ram 4x4, 96 Dak, 96 Intruder 1400, 96 FireFly | `------------------------------------------ http://www.jonsteiger.com ----'



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:41 EST