Bill,
the simpleset thing to do is measure it out... as for width, tires
hanging out it should hurt anything, should improve on rear stability in
GenII IMHO. I think we talked about this a week ago or so, that the front
end on GenII is a couple inches wider then the rear as well.
I too had thought about this, stealing GenIII axles for my GenII, but then
Im back in the same boat im in now, expensive lifts(I do not want just a
body lift) and a frontend setup that just looks nasty with all the garbage
hangin down to ground...
Bill Day
Linux 2.2.20-1tr i586
9:10am up 24 days, 14:45, 0 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
We're still up at irc.openprojects.net @ #linux-users
or irc.freenode.net @ #linux-users
http://counter.li.org #83358
http://sxs.daysdomain.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: <B1LLYW@aol.com>
To: <dml@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:04 AM
Subject: DML: Transplanting 9 1/4 Out Of A Gen III into a Gen II
>
> I'm looking at swapping a 9 1/4 rear out of a Gen III into a Gen II. Has
> anyone done this? The Gen III rear looks to be a little wider but not too
> much. If I run fender flares on my '95, the tires should still fit just
> fine. I'm not too concerned about moving shock mounts/spring mounts if
> necessary. Has anyone out there actually done this?
>
> Bill White - http://www.bionicdodge.com
>
> '02 Dakota QC 4x4, SLT +, 4.7, 5 spd, 3.92 LSD
> '95 Dakota CC 4x2, SLT, 318, 5 spd, 3.55 LSD
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 1/21/03
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:46 EST