Re: Trasko Oil Filter - 1/10th of Micron cleaning

From: Josh Battles (jbattles@bankfinancial.com)
Date: Thu Jan 30 2003 - 11:22:54 EST


magnetizes fuel?!?!!?!?
i must have missed that memo, WTF is that?

--
-Josh
2000 Dakota CC 3.9L

""Rick Barnes"" <barnesrv@attbi.com> wrote in message news:000801c2c87a$e0e38e50$0200a8c0@sys15... > > What the heck is the "Enhancer" thingy on that site? Looks like another > gadget that magnetizes fuel... > Rascal > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of KenCo > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:59 AM > To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net > Subject: Re: DML: Trasko Oil Filter - 1/10th of Micron cleaning > > > Terrible Tom wrote: > > at $60-$70 bucks per filter - if I am going to change it every 3K - well > > that just doesnt work out right. If I'm going to change it ever 3K - > > I'll use a standard filter. Changing it every 3K would guarentee the oil > > stays fresh and clean. The whole pretense behind that filter is > > superior cleaning and extended oil life and quality. > > > > > > theres a cart. INSIDE the filter that gets changed, > the housing is reuseable ;) > > > > > > > -- > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---- > > Terrible Tom > > > > "It's a living thing... It breathes, it eats, ...and it hates..." > > > > Silver '89 Dakota Reg Cab, V6, Auto, 8 footer, 4x2 > > Silver '89 Dakota Reg Cab, V6, Auto, 8 footer, 4x4 w plow - (aka Granpa) > > Green/Silver '95 Jeep Cherokee, I-6 HO, Auto, 4 door, 4x4 > > > > AIM Screen name: SilverEightynine > > Yahoo Messenger: SilverEightynine > > > > DML Profile URL: > > http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/LkxxVw49jp7dU/ > > > -- > http://www.kencofish.com Ken Arnold, 401-781-9642 > Importer/Exporter of Goldfish,Koi,rare Predators > Shipping to legal states/countries only! > Permalon liners, Oase & Supreme Pondmaster pumps > > > Please Note: No trees or animals were harmed in the > sending of this contaminant free message We do concede > that a signicant number of electrons may have been > inconvenienced. >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:46 EST