Re: Re: Pure embarassment... (Long,but easy reading.)

From: Kyle Vanditmars (kylevan@telus.net)
Date: Mon Feb 03 2003 - 11:43:01 EST

Next message: greg conner: "Re: Engine Weight"
Previous message: greg conner: "Re: Air Filter"
In reply to: Punch: "Re: Pure embarassment... (Long,but easy reading.)"
Next in thread: kenallgood@cox.net: "Re: Re: Re: Pure embarassment... (Long,but easy reading.)"
Maybe reply: kenallgood@cox.net: "Re: Re: Re: Pure embarassment... (Long,but easy reading.)"
Reply: steve preston: "Re: Re: Re: Pure embarassment... (Long,but easy reading.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>
> any reason you couldn't slow down and let her in?
>
> punch
>
>

His manliness, of course. And yes, it's completely irrational, and likely
stupid.

Next message: greg conner: "Re: Engine Weight"
Previous message: greg conner: "Re: Air Filter"
In reply to: Punch: "Re: Pure embarassment... (Long,but easy reading.)"
Next in thread: kenallgood@cox.net: "Re: Re: Re: Pure embarassment... (Long,but easy reading.)"
Maybe reply: kenallgood@cox.net: "Re: Re: Re: Pure embarassment... (Long,but easy reading.)"
Reply: steve preston: "Re: Re: Re: Pure embarassment... (Long,but easy reading.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:49 EST