keep in mind that the Durango R/T is AWD. if you don't need the front-wheel
portion, look for a 5.9L 4x2. also, the 4.7L might be more economical in
that engine.
keep in mind that although the 4.7L has less power, you can modify that
engine with High-output Cams, and a High-output intake. there are more
performance parts available for that engine than there used to be, and i
imagine that they are being increased on a daily basis.
Gabe Couriel
http://frontpage.tripod.com/fijigabe0
Doing my best to cure ignorance since 1980!
--- 1998 Dodge Dakota Club Cab 239ci V6 - 175hp 5 speed - AX15 8.25 Rear-end w/ 3.21 open differential- Modifications -
Performance: Homemade Cold Air Intake, Flowmaster 40 Cat-back Exhaust, Autolite 3923 Spark Plugs, Mopar Performance 7.5mm Spark Plug Wires, Mobil 1 15W50 Synthetic Motor Oil w/ Mopar Performance Oil Filter.
Audio: Sony Mobile CDX 4180 AM/FM CD Player (40Watt x 4 Channel), Sony Xplod XS-R1610 6½ 3-Way Speakers (160 Total Watts)
-----Original Message----- From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of RayB Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 11:41 AM To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net Subject: DML: RE: Durango R/T
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of Got MoPar ? > aar.mopar.cc
<snip> > Any complaints about long distance traveling > in a Durango? >
Mark, no personal experience but my sister and her husband rented an '02 Durango for a trip from Ohio to Montana and really liked it. Their daily drivers are a '96 Intrepid and a '99 Grand Cherokee.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:51 EST