It must have been the lighting in Hooters...either that or you were paying
WAAAAY too much attention to the waitresses' rear ends. ;-) But seriously,
I think it would look cool. It's not my fault you're a redneck (no offense
to anyone on the list) and can't appreciate these types of things.
heh.......heh........heh......
-- -Josh 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L""BARRY OLIVER"" <DHSPA58@dhs.state.il.us> wrote in message news:se6df2d0.098@mail.dhs.state.il.us... > > Gee, Josh, when I met you last week, you didn't look Mexican... [no offense to any mexicans on the list] > > >>> jbattles@bankfinancial.com 03/11/03 01:32PM >>> > > I've noticed that it was quiet as well Ken. It breaks my heart to have to > actually *work* while at work. I use the DML to help break up my day and > keep me from going insane. > > I think we could start a better thread than generation bashing though. > Perhaps we could go very in-depth about drivetrain swaps or perhaps even an > idea that i've been kicking around for a while now...chopping the roof a gen > III by 2-3 inches to give it a more "customized" look. I think it would > look badass, but I'm saving this one for when I win the lottery. > > What do you think? > > -- > -Josh > 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L > > > <kenallgood@cox.net> wrote in message > news:20030311185750.ILMY18293.lakemtao01.cox.net@smtp.east.cox.net... > > > > Sure is quiet today...... If I didn't know better, would think I'm on > AOL or something *shudder*. > > > > hmmmmmmm... What to do to stir up the masses... hmmm.. > > > > AHHHH!! Why in the world would anyone want a Gen I or II Dakota?? > Those things are so ugly, only thing I would use one for is to go 4 wheeling > in so I don't mess up my better looking Gen 3 Dakota =D > > > > 1 excecption - although slow, those Shelby's look decent enough. > > > > *running & ducking* > > > > Ken Allgood > > 97 CC SLT 5.2L > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:59 EST