Thanks, a lot of people have something good to say about them. Talked to
hughes and krc so far, Ill give them a try now!
TJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "greg conner" <dodgeboy93@hotmail.com>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Re: Re: Mag Ported Head ?
>
> Ya get this kinda crap on every kind of list tj. Call or email dan at
the
> fast man he can help you out. He really knows his shit when it comes to
> heads...and is a great guy to boot.
>
> www.thefastman.com
>
>
> Greg Conner
> 1996 RC
> 3.9 hybrid
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "TJ Goettner" <dakota52318@toad.net>
> >Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> >To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> >Subject: DML: Re: Re: Mag Ported Head ?
> >Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 21:47:03 -0800
> >
> >How can I not be, the port cc on a stock head is 153 as is on the
"ported"
> >head, chamber size is both 60cc... so according to the book, the only
> >difference is the valve size, so where is my orange in that? Oh, and
when
> >I
> >can pull $3000 outa my butt, I will test them both. So instead of a
smart
> >remark, how about some info, not everyone on the list is an engine tech.
> >
> >
> >TJ
> >dakota52318@toad.net
> >1992 Dodge Dakota 4X4
> >Long Bed, 318, 46RH Auto
> >DT Headers, Functional RamAir Hood
> >K&N FIPK, Flowmaster Muffler
> >Custom Throttle Body
> >MP Computer
> >15.74@87.59
> >4350lbs
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Chad Evans" <hemidak@msn.com>
> >To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> >Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 6:14 PM
> >Subject: DML: Re: Mag Ported Head ?
> >
> >
> > >
> > > you are not comparing apples to apples
> > > one is a ported head the other is not.
> > > test them both out of the box then ask again!
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "TJ" <dakota52318@toad.net>
> > > To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 8:47 PM
> > > Subject: DML: Mag Ported Head ?
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > OK, gotta question here... according to my reading, if you can get 2
> >heads
> > > > to flow the exact same numbers (230cfm) at say, 28"... one having a
> >153cc
> > > > intake port w/ a 1.97" valve, and the other having a 180cc port w/ a
> >1.92
> > > > valve, the head with the 153cc port is better because it will have a
> > > higher
> > > > intake velocity. IS THIS CORRECT??? OR does the intake valve size
> >change
> > > > this theory because according to hughes engines this is the way it
> > > works....
> > > > NOW if you look in the 2001 MP catalog, the 2 heads I just compared
> >were
> > > the
> > > > stock ported mag heads and the R/T heads... the stock ported being
the
> > > > better head. How and Why is this??
> > > >
> > > > TJ
> > > > dakota52318@toad.net
> > > > 1992 Dodge Dakota 4X4
> > > > Long Bed, 318, 46RH Auto
> > > > DT Headers, Functional RamAir Hood
> > > > K&N FIPK, Flowmaster Muffler
> > > > Custom Throttle Body
> > > > MP Computer
> > > > 15.74@87.59
> > > > 4350lbs
> > > >
> > >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:01 EST