Oh, sure, no doubt about that, but if you are talking then about a street
motor, that will never see past 5000 RPMs, then the RT heads are a waste...
Now for a serious race motor, or supercharged or something, oh hell, they
are the way to go!
TJ
dakota52318@toad.net
1992 Dodge Dakota 4X4
Long Bed, 318, 46RH Auto
DT Headers, Functional RamAir Hood
K&N FIPK, Flowmaster Muffler
Custom Throttle Body
MP Computer
15.74@87.59
4350lbs
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 7:11 PM
Subject: DML: RE: Re: RE: Porting stock heads (Ray Block)
>
> There are exceptions to that. It all depends on application and engine
> build-up.
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of TJ
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 12:10 AM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: DML: Re: RE: Porting stock heads (Ray Block)
>
>
>
> If you talk to Dan at Fastman, he'll say even unported r/t heads are too
> much, look at the chart for the heads in the MP catalog... 180 something
> port and 230 cfm for the r/t heads and with a 153 cc port the stock
> "ported heads flowed the same.... sounds like a better head to me... if
> you price it, they are also more exspensive!!
>
> TJ
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:03 EST