Re: gen 2 vs gen 3 8 1/4 axel

From: Jason Bleazard (jason.dml@bleazard.net)
Date: Thu May 01 2003 - 21:02:56 EDT

Uhhhh... on the gen IIs, the 9.25 was never available. The 7.25 was
standard with the 2.5L 4-cylinder engine. Not every Dak is just like the
gen IIIs. 

-- 
Jason Bleazard  http://www.bleazard.net  Toronto, Ontario
his:  '95 Dakota Sport 4x4, 3.9 V6, 5spd, Reg. Cab, white
hers: '01 Dakota Sport 4x4, 4.7 V8, Auto, Quad Cab, black

Didn't you read the disclaimer?  http://www.they.com/disclaimer

On Thu, 01 May 2003 21:37:52 Bernd D. Ratsch wrote:
> 
> Uhhhh...they're 8.25" and 9.25".
> 
> - Bernd
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of greg
> conner
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 5:51 PM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: DML: gen 2 vs gen 3 8 1/4 axel
> 
> 
> 
> Hey List
> 
>   Have a 1996 dakota that I'm helping a local guy convert from a 2.5 to
> a
> 5.2.  I want to upgrade the rear axel from the 7.25 to the 8.25.  What
> is
> the difference in the axels from 96 to 97?  I know the spline count
> changed,
> but are the spring perches and such in the same spots?  Will this rear
> bolt
> onto the springs of a gen 2 dak?
> 
> Thanks

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:17 EST