Re: RE: gen 2 vs gen 3 8 1/4 axel

From: greg conner (dodgeboy93@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu May 01 2003 - 21:21:18 EDT


what????

heheh...long day bernd?

Greg Conner
1996 RC
3.9 hybrid

>From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>Subject: DML: RE: gen 2 vs gen 3 8 1/4 axel
>Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 19:37:52 -0600
>
>
>Uhhhh...they're 8.25" and 9.25".
>
>- Bernd
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
>[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of greg
>conner
>Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 5:51 PM
>To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>Subject: DML: gen 2 vs gen 3 8 1/4 axel
>
>
>
>Hey List
>
> Have a 1996 dakota that I'm helping a local guy convert from a 2.5 to
>a
>5.2. I want to upgrade the rear axel from the 7.25 to the 8.25. What
>is
>the difference in the axels from 96 to 97? I know the spline count
>changed,
>but are the spring perches and such in the same spots? Will this rear
>bolt
>onto the springs of a gen 2 dak?
>
>Thanks
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:17 EST