RE: RE: RE: RE: sack

From: BARRY OLIVER (DHSPA58@dhs.state.il.us)
Date: Wed May 07 2003 - 16:05:43 EDT


Yikes! That's what she meant?

wow, I guess I will be more careful when I get ready to go home tonight.. I won't ever look at my truck the same way again - thanks..

>>> RiverSparrow@hotpop.com 05/07/03 02:01PM >>>

Transvestite trucks?

~ lora

'98 Dakota Sport "Rebel" - R.I.P.
'69 Ford F-100
'94 Dodge Shadow

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Norah
Bleazard
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 1:37 PM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: sack

Thanks Rascal ;-)

Here's something that I find most confusing. Most people refer to their
vehicles as "she". She runs great... She's got power.... She's my dream
car... etc. etc. etc. But, if that's the case... why does she have male
parts? Is she a "she-male"?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Norah Bleazard http://www.bleazard.net Toronto, Ontario
hers: '01 Dakota Sport 4x4, 4.7 V8, Auto, Quad Cab, black (Black
Diamond)
his: '95 Dakota Sport 4x4, 3.9 V6, 5spd, Reg. Cab, white (White Knight)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:18 EST