these "fish eyes" are invisible now though, right? i don't mind paying a
little extra for finish work if they can ensure a perfect surface when
they're done.
-- - Josh Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L<jon@dakota-truck.net> wrote in message news:ba3bjk$njl$1@bent.twistedbits.net... > > "Josh Battles" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com> wrote: > > : <jon@dakota-truck.net> wrote in message > : news:ba389g$gn9$2@bent.twistedbits.net... > > :> Sure thing. :-) I've got one on my '96. Its a nice cover, but it > :> did have "fish eyes" in the fiberglass so it took a decent amount of prep > :> work prior to painting, but its a good cover for the money, especially if > :> you like the flush mount look. I ordered mine several years ago, they > : sent > :> it via truck freight but shipping was very reasonable. > :> > > : How much prep work? Does it look nice and smooth with no > : ripples/imperfections and such? I'm pretty picky like that, and if it's not > : the greatest thing I might just have to bypasss and wait for something more > : expensive that won't have any imperfections in it. > > > The surface itself was nice and flat, just had quite a few fish > eyes in it. I didn't do the painting myself, but my body shop guy > said he had to sand it several times. > > > -- > > -Jon- > > .---- Jon Steiger ------ jon@dakota-truck.net or jon@jonsteiger.com ------. > | I'm the: AOPA, DoD, EAA, NMA, NRA, SPA, USUA. Rec & UL Pilot - SEL | > | 70 Cuda, 90 Dak 'vert, 92 Ram 4x4, 96 Dak, 96 Intruder 1400, 96 FireFly | > `------------------------------------------ http://www.jonsteiger.com ----'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:20 EST