jon@dakota-truck.net wrote:
>"Jason Bleazard" <jason.dml@bleazard.net> wrote:
>
>: ----- Original Message -----
>: From: <jon@dakota-truck.net>
>: Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 10:00 PM
>
>:> Scuffing the paint is causing "excess wear"?
>
>: Only one thing to add here (I think you covered the rest Jon :-).
>
>: We asked our dealer about getting a spray-in liner in our '98 when we leased
>: it. They warned us not to, unless we wanted to get hit with a huge "excess
>: wear" charge when we turned it back in. The only explanation they could
>: offer was some weak drivel about "but what if the next owner doesn't *want*
>: a spray-in liner? It might hurt our ability to re-sell it, and since it's a
>: permanent modification we can't remove it."
>
>
> Ok - THAT makes some sense - at least now I can see where it came
>from. I can certainly see how the "excess wear" claim can be made -
>when talking about a leased vehicle, and looking at it from the
>dealership's perspective. I was thinking strictly of owned trucks,
>and it just did not compute! :-)
>
>
>
>
But what happens if the person doesn't want a drop-in bedliner and wants
a mat instead? Will they pull out the dop-in and exposed that bare bed?
-- -Droo Email: 03dakotaCC4.7_4x4@comcast.net"Remember: No one has the right to touch you in your bathing suit area." -Jack
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:20 EST